W.2_David King_Kaizen

Kaizen is a philosophy for continuous incremental improvement. In Japanese Kaizen is derived from the words kai meaning change and zen meaning become good. The understanding of this philosophy is important to this team and to project management.

I believe that this project was designed with this philosophy in mind. The idea behind the project is just do a piece of the puzzle as you ago. Continuously plug away at the project. Piece by piece the pieces will fall into place the work will get done. The idea behind this is very efficient and allows for project team members to work out solutions to inefficiencies early on. However, when the continuous work stops, the inefficiencies begin to creep up and control is lost on the project. The project can be brought back under control, but usually at the expense or resource of time, quality, and cost.

The concern I have for the team on this project and I have seen on other projects I have worked on is the desire to eat all the float in the beginning, push everything into urgent and important matter forcing the entire project to run on crisis management mode.

By working using kaizen, not only would we bring about good change, but we would drive down costs, increase quality, and work more efficiently. The real question is, as a team, why can’t we do this? As project management professionals this is a bandwagon we need to jump on to ensure that we do deliver the projects the way we are supposed to, with quality, on or ahead of schedule, and on or under budget.


(2007). Small Change: Read a Few More Pages. Retrieved from Web Site: http://www.projectkaizen.com/small-change/small-change-read-a-few-more-pages.html#more-20

(2011). Kaizen Philosophy and Kaizen Method. Retrieved from Web Site: http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/methods_kaizen.html

This entry was posted in David King, Group Member, Week #2, Weekly Submission. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to W.2_David King_Kaizen

  1. DrPDG says:

    David….. Ya Ampyun…….

    How many months you been writing these things now? When you took your PSP, didn’t you have to first OUTLINE what you were going to write? What happened to the template I provided? Where is your problem statement? What are the alternative choices? How are you going to monitor whatever recommendations you are making?

    Not that I disagree with your topic or your conclusions, but you need to go back and redo this posting as a W2.1, but the next time you post it, PLEASE, follow the TEMPLATE I provided you with.

    Once you get really good at following that template, I will provide you with some others….

    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s